Notice of Proposed Rule

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Board of Optometry
RULE NO: RULE TITLE
64B13-5.002: Criteria for Approval
PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The purpose of the amendment is to clarify that instructors for courses focusing on optometric practice management need not hold doctoral level degrees.
SUMMARY: The rule clarifies that instructors of optometric practice management courses need not hold doctoral degrees.
SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS: No Statement of Estimated Regulatory Cost was prepared.
Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
SPECIFIC AUTHORITY: 463.005(1) FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED: 463.007(4) FS.
IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN FAW.
THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Joe Baker, Jr., Executive Director, Board of Optometry, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C07, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3257

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

64B13-5.002 Criteria for Approval.

(1) In determining whether to approve a program of continuing professional education, the Board shall consider whether the program contributes to the improvement, advancement, and extension of one’s professional skill and knowledge to the benefit of the patient he or she serves. Continuing education courses in Florida jurisprudence as stated in paragraphs 64B13-5.001(1)(e) and (f), F.A.C., shall be provided by an individual or organization with demonstrated competence in Florida Law pertaining to optometric practice as evidenced by the individual or organization’s credentials, education and experience.

(2) Approval of non-transcript quality continuing education programs.

(a) A non-transcript quality continuing education program must satisfy the following criteria or course content:

1. The course must be an organized program of learning that will contribute to the advancement and enhancement of professional competency and scientific knowledge in the practice of optometry, and must be designed to reflect the educational needs of Florida optometrists.

2. The course must have scientific and educational integrity and must contain customary and generally accepted optometric and medical practices.

3. The course must have an outline which demonstrates consistency with the course description and reflects the course content.

4. A course handout/outline must be provided to all participants.

5. The course must be taught in a manner appropriate to the educational content, objectives, and purpose of the program, and must allow suitable time to be effectively presented to the audience.

6. The minimum credit for any qualified course is one hour. One hour of continuing education credit equals fifty (50) minutes of instructional time.

7. Instructors must have the necessary qualifications, training and experience to present the course. Principal instructors must hold a minimum of a doctorate-level degree (O.D., M.D., Ph.D., D.O., J.D., D.D.S., D.C., Pharm.D., L.L.D., D.Ed., D.Sc., etc.) or its international equivalent. Faculties at accredited schools or colleges of optometry are exempt from this requirement. Individuals who do not hold at least a doctorate-level degree, or are not on faculty at an accredited school or college of optometry shall only be listed as adjunct instructors for the course and only when the principal instructor holds a doctorate-level degree. For courses focusing on optometric practice management, instructors are not required to hold doctoral level degrees, but must demonstrate their expertise in providing such continuing education.

(b) A non-transcript quality continuing education program shall be approved upon presentation of the following information by the program or course provider or by a licensed practitioner who attended the course:

1. Compliance with the criteria or course content specified in subparagraphs (2)(a)1.-7., above;

2. Date(s) and time(s) of each course.

3. Complete outline of course, including a breakdown of hours for each subject.

4. Evidence that the fee specified in subsections 64B13-6.001(15) and (16), F.A.C., has been paid; provided however, should the provider not seek approval of the course, the licensed practitioner seeking approval of the course shall pay the fee.

5. Notwithstanding subparagraphs (2)(b)1.-3., if the program is non-transcript quality and has been previously approved by the Council on Optometric Practitioner Education (COPE), or by any other recognized organization that sponsors optometric education, utilizing the criteria set forth in paragraph (2)(a), the Board shall approve the program upon submission of the approved course number issued by COPE or other recognized organization and compliance with subparagraph (2)(b)4.

(3) Approval of transcript quality continuing education programs.

(a) A transcript quality continuing education program must satisfy the following criteria or course content:

1. Compliance with the criteria or course content specified in subparagraphs (2)(a)1.-6.

2. The course must be in consultation with or sponsored by a school or college of optometry or equivalent entity.

3. The course must be in at least two (2) hour blocks.

4. The course must be taught by instructors approved by the Board. Faculty members that instruct regular courses for the sponsoring school or equivalent educational entity will automatically be approved. Instructors not fitting into this category must be approved by the Board.

5. The course must require a Board approved examination with a passing grade. Grading and certification of examinations can be delegated by the provider to an equivalent educational entity.

6. The examination must be monitored or mailed to the licensee after the course.

(b) A transcript quality continuing education program shall be approved upon presentation of the following:

1. Compliance with the criteria or course content specified in subparagraphs (3)(a)1.-6.

2. Date(s) and time(s) of each course.

3. Complete outline of course, including a breakdown of hours for each subject.

4. A letter from the dean of the sponsoring school or college of optometry or equivalent educational entity certifying transcript quality credit.

5. A copy of the examination to be given, with the answer key.

6. Identification of the entity responsible for grading and certifying the examination(s).

7. Evidence that the fee specified in subsections 64B13-6.001(15) and (16), F.A.C., has been paid.

(c) In order for a course to be considered transcript quality, it must be approved by the Board as transcript quality prior to the time it is taken.

(4) A course needs to be approved only once during the biennium in which it is presented so long as the presenter and the course outline do not change.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 463.005(1) FS. Law Implemented 463.007(4) FS. History–New 11-13-79, Formerly 21Q-5.02, Amended 12-16-86, 12-11-88, 7-10-91, 10-28-92, Formerly 21Q-5.002, 61F8-5.002, Amended 11-29-94, 7-5-95, 8-18-96, Formerly 59V-5.002, Amended 3-21-00, 5-8-02, 8-19-03, 12-26-05, 12-25-06, ________.


NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Optometry
NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Optometry
DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: July 22, 2009
DATE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED IN FAW: August 7, 2009